It Takes a Network and More: Athlete Activism and the Co-Creation of Athlete-Brand Meaning

Matthias Anderski et al.

Australasian Marketing Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582261426042article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Activism has the potential to both positively and negatively impact an athlete’s brand meaning (e.g., the perceptions held by others about the athlete). The present research extends prior work into how this occurs by adopting, for the first time, a multi-actor perspective. The data comes from the Instagram posts of 608 German athletes who participated in one of three mega sporting events (Tokyo 2021 Olympics, Beijing 2022 Olympics, and the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar). Using an qualitative research design, we uncovered ten actor groups that contribute to the co-creation of branding meaning for activist athletes, and four different “levels” of co-creation performances: Autonomous activism, collaborative activism , sports-network activism , and beyond-network activism. We also found that brand meaning co-creation can be influenced by the number of actors involved, independent to the activism issue. Theoretically, the research contributes a novel framework for understanding the co-creation of an athlete’s brand meaning when engaging in activism and offers strategic insights for brand managers on the need to balance activism with other brand building efforts.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582261426042

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthias2026,
  title        = {{It Takes a Network and More: Athlete Activism and the Co-Creation of Athlete-Brand Meaning}},
  author       = {Matthias Anderski et al.},
  journal      = {Australasian Marketing Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582261426042},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

It Takes a Network and More: Athlete Activism and the Co-Creation of Athlete-Brand Meaning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.