arbiter
JournalsAccount

Market instruments and forests: Evaluating the EU'S deforestation-free regulation in Brazil's soy supply chain

Heloiza Prazeres da Silva Stam et al.

Forest Policy and Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103761article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The European Union's Deforestation-Free Regulation (EUDR), approved in 2023 and set to take effect in December 2026, mandates plot-level traceability and physical segregation of compliant from non-compliant products in supply chains linked to deforestation. This paper assesses the economic and environmental impacts of EUDR compliance costs on Brazil's soybean supply chain. Using a dynamic multiregional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with integrated land-use transitions, we simulate counterfactual outcomes from 2026 to 2035 under two policy scenarios: (i) Legal Amazon–only coverage (S1-AMZN) and (ii) nationwide coverage (S2-BRA). Compliance costs are modeled as production-tax equivalents, scaled by the regional share of EU-bound soybean-equivalent exports. Results show cumulative export losses of US$ 85.1 billion (S1-AMZN) and US$ 216.3 billion (S2-BRA), with corresponding real GDP shortfalls of US$ 409.9 billion and US$ 1.167 trillion. Avoided deforestation ranges from 51,466 to 105,899 ha, though leakage effects emerge under S1-AMZN. Estimated abatement costs are US$ 133–207 per ton of CO₂e, while forgone GDP per hectare of avoided deforestation ranges from US$ 58,630 to US$ 171,652. These findings suggest that clearing the EU's soy supply chain of deforestation alone delivers limited environmental benefits at high economic cost, underscoring the need to complement trade-based measures with robust domestic land-use governance and enforcement policies. • EUDR lowers Brazil's GDP slightly and deepens regional income disparities • Soy export losses drive land and labor shifts toward corn, cotton, and other crops • Welfare gains for the poorest and richest, losses for middle incomes • Modest avoided deforestation at high economic cost • National versus Amazon-only enforcement yields similar macro but less leakage

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103761

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{heloiza2026,
  title        = {{Market instruments and forests: Evaluating the EU'S deforestation-free regulation in Brazil's soy supply chain}},
  author       = {Heloiza Prazeres da Silva Stam et al.},
  journal      = {Forest Policy and Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103761},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Market instruments and forests: Evaluating the EU'S deforestation-free regulation in Brazil's soy supply chain

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.