The generalized panel data stochastic frontier model: A review and nonparametric estimation

Christopher F. Parmeter & Subal C. Kumbhakar

Journal of Productivity Analysis2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-025-00769-zreview
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Recently, the four component generalized stochastic frontier model has become increasingly common in practical applications. However, it remains tethered to potentially restrictive distributional assumptions on all four random components. In this paper, we show that when certain exogenous variables uniquely influence technology, time-varying inefficiency, or persistent inefficiency, all components of the model can be identified nonparametrically. In essence we require separability between the frontier, the conditional mean of time-varying inefficiency, and the conditional mean of persistent inefficiency. Given that our identification hinges on differencing, we recommend using splines or sieves to estimate each of the components of the model. We provide a short application to demonstrate the workings of the method.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-025-00769-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2025,
  title        = {{The generalized panel data stochastic frontier model: A review and nonparametric estimation}},
  author       = {Christopher F. Parmeter & Subal C. Kumbhakar},
  journal      = {Journal of Productivity Analysis},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-025-00769-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The generalized panel data stochastic frontier model: A review and nonparametric estimation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.