arbiter
JournalsAccount

Implicit Taxes in Imperfect Markets

Hannah Smith

Advances in Taxation2021https://doi.org/10.1108/s1058-749720210000029001book-chapter
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.58

Abstract

This research addresses the question of whether market competition influences a firm's implicit tax burden. Implicit taxes are defined as the pretax rate of return disadvantage earned on an investment that is taxed preferentially. The Scholes and Wolfson (1992) model predicts that implicit taxes will fully offset any benefit from preferential tax treatment leading to no benefit from lower explicit taxes; however, their theory assumes perfect market competition. This chapter relaxes the assumption of perfect market competition and finds that firms in industries with lower competition bear lower implicit taxes and firms in industries with higher competition bear higher implicit taxes. These findings are consistent with monopoly and oligopoly behavior predictions where firms in less competitive industries have greater price setting power and can retain more of their tax savings while market forces in competitive industries force companies to pass along any savings to customers (Mason, 1939). Furthermore, these findings answer the call in the literature for more research on determinants of cross-sectional variation in implicit taxes (Shackelford & Shevlin, 2001).

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1058-749720210000029001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hannah2021,
  title        = {{Implicit Taxes in Imperfect Markets}},
  author       = {Hannah Smith},
  journal      = {Advances in Taxation},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1058-749720210000029001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Implicit Taxes in Imperfect Markets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.58

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.58 × 0.4 = 0.23
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.