Marketing in the post-truth era: From the consumption of false beliefs to regulatory action – The case of fantastic archaeology

Philippe Robert-Demontrond

Recherche et Applications en Marketing2026https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707261430185article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The marketplace of beliefs is undergoing a profound transformation. Scientific theories are increasingly being eclipsed by unconventional narratives that resonate powerfully across social media and digital platforms. Many academic institutions have been profoundly challenged by these developments. Within this shifting epistemic landscape, marketing can assume a new and critical role: developing effective communication strategies, in collaboration with scientists, to counter the spread of false theories. Archaeology provides a particularly revealing case. As a discipline, it faces the rapid proliferation of alternative theories that attract massive audiences. The objective of this study is to examine the foundational drivers of the consumption of such alternative narratives in order to formulate practical recommendations. The findings indicate that the practice of “fantastic archaeology” constitutes both a cultural and a countercultural project. Its defining features – drawing on punk aesthetics, fandom logics, and conspiratorial worldviews – call for a fundamental rethinking of scientific communication.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707261430185

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{philippe2026,
  title        = {{Marketing in the post-truth era: From the consumption of false beliefs to regulatory action – The case of fantastic archaeology}},
  author       = {Philippe Robert-Demontrond},
  journal      = {Recherche et Applications en Marketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707261430185},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Marketing in the post-truth era: From the consumption of false beliefs to regulatory action – The case of fantastic archaeology

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.