Rebels Do Not Take Kindly to Criticism: The Strategic Failure of Local Resistance against Colombia’s FARC

Urban Reichhold

Journal of Latin American Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25100692article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Nonviolent resistance against rebels has received increasing scholarly attention over the past decade. Research has explained why and when civilians engage in resistance or place different types of demands on rebels. However, the question of whether nonviolent resistance succeeds or fails to achieve its objectives remains understudied. This article addresses this gap by theorising and testing three key factors that shape rebel responses to civilian resistance: the nature of civilian demands, the power of civilian resisters, and the rebels’ own power. Fieldwork in Colombia’s Caquetá region reveals that FARC rebels accommodated civilian demands only when these did not threaten their strategic goals. The group responded with repression whenever resisters clashed with its politico-military objectives. While unarmed resistance campaigns have successfully overthrown repressive states, there is no evidence for civilians in Colombia or elsewhere managing to push armed groups to make far-reaching concessions, let alone defeat rebels via nonviolent action only.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25100692

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{urban2025,
  title        = {{Rebels Do Not Take Kindly to Criticism: The Strategic Failure of Local Resistance against Colombia’s FARC}},
  author       = {Urban Reichhold},
  journal      = {Journal of Latin American Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x25100692},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rebels Do Not Take Kindly to Criticism: The Strategic Failure of Local Resistance against Colombia’s FARC

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.