arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

ESG Perspectives to Investing: Translating ESG into Investment and Scores, and Challenges of Translations

Minh Thi Hong Dinh

European Business Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2025006article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

p class="MsoNormal"Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have become integral in investment decision-making. Investors increasingly recognize their potential impact on financial performance and long-term sustainability. This article explores the various perspectives surrounding ESG investing, focusing on the process of translating ESG information into investment strategies and scores. However, the process of ESG translation is not without challenges. The article thus addresses the complexities and obstacles inherent in translating ESG factors into quantifiable scores and investment process. One of the challenges in translating ESG into investment is the absence of standardized metrics and inconsistency in reporting practices. Additionally, the dynamic nature of ESG factors makes it challenging to effectively incorporate future changes. Moreover, translation challenges arise due to inadequate disclosure and transparency in ESG reporting. Addressing these challenges requires collaborative efforts from stakeholders, regulators, investors, and companies to establish guidelines and frameworks that encourage consistent reporting and disclosure of ESG information.o:p/o:p

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2025006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{minh2025,
  title        = {{ESG Perspectives to Investing: Translating ESG into Investment and Scores, and Challenges of Translations}},
  author       = {Minh Thi Hong Dinh},
  journal      = {European Business Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2025006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

ESG Perspectives to Investing: Translating ESG into Investment and Scores, and Challenges of Translations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.