arbiter
JournalsAccount

Market Categories and Strategic Positioning: When Deviating From Prototypes Hurts Performance Less

Jaime Gómez et al.

Business Research Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444251408343article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Audience expectations within categories often create pressures for firms to conform to prototypical behaviors. Drawing on categorization theory, this study examines how strategic deviation from the category prototype influences firm performance. While prior research has highlighted the penalties associated with nonconformity, recent work suggests that these effects may vary depending on firm- and category-level characteristics. This study proposes three factors that moderate the negative impact of strategic deviation on performance: firm reputation, category distinctiveness, and category social mission. Empirical evidence is drawn from a panel dataset comprising Spanish retail banking firms between 2000 and 2007. Results from fixed-effects models with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors indicate that firms that deviate from the category prototype exhibit lower performance. However, this effect is significantly attenuated for firms with strong reputations, those operating in highly distinctive categories, and those belonging to categories aligned with socially valued missions. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L10, M10

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444251408343

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jaime2026,
  title        = {{Market Categories and Strategic Positioning: When Deviating From Prototypes Hurts Performance Less}},
  author       = {Jaime Gómez et al.},
  journal      = {Business Research Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444251408343},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Market Categories and Strategic Positioning: When Deviating From Prototypes Hurts Performance Less

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.