Reframing Innovation for Post-growth: Lessons from Patent Discourses in 3D Printing

Alex Pazaitis et al.

Science, Technology and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326836article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

While traditional science, technology and innovation (STI) policy has emphasised protecting intellectual property through patents and copyright, evidence suggests these tools may not optimally serve both innovators and society. Alternative innovation approaches based on openness and shared technology are emerging that could better address societal needs while supporting more sustainable production. We examine the development of 3D printing technology, where the expiration of key patents enabled a dynamic, open innovation ecosystem. This open-source approach has led to new forms of collaborative organisation around shared designs and resources, facilitating broad technology adoption across diverse communities. Analysing these practices through the lens of digital commons practices, we explore how they enabled alternative business models in 3D printing, while acknowledging tensions with dominant market structures. We propose an STI framework based on the commons that prioritises social and environmental benefits in alignment with post-growth values.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326836

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alex2025,
  title        = {{Reframing Innovation for Post-growth: Lessons from Patent Discourses in 3D Printing}},
  author       = {Alex Pazaitis et al.},
  journal      = {Science, Technology and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326836},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reframing Innovation for Post-growth: Lessons from Patent Discourses in 3D Printing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.