Environmental Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Effect of Board Gender Diversity

Mukesh Nepal et al.

Indian Journal of Corporate Governance2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862251315539article
ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

This study aims to empirically examine the moderating effect of board gender diversity (BGD) on environmental performance and firm value. Following a longitudinal research design, it collects data by accessing the Bloomberg database for the National Stock Exchange (NSE)-listed Nifty-50 indexed firms covering 2018–2021. The study employs the Hausman test to identify a suitable model between fixed and random effects. The results have revealed that BGD is unlikely to moderate the relationship between environmental performance and firm value. However, the study reveals that BGD positively and significantly impacts environmental performance. On the other hand, the results report an insignificant relationship between BGD and firm value, proxying both accounting and market-based firm value measures. The study has acknowledged a few limitations and provided policy implications, such as introducing stringent measures for ensuring the independence of women directors (WDs) in boardroom discussions and a new provision to increase women’s participation on the board. Moreover, the study also paved the way for future research.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862251315539

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mukesh2025,
  title        = {{Environmental Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Effect of Board Gender Diversity}},
  author       = {Mukesh Nepal et al.},
  journal      = {Indian Journal of Corporate Governance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862251315539},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Environmental Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Effect of Board Gender Diversity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.