arbiter
JournalsAccount

Test Motivation and Performance of Older Versus Younger Test‐Takers: Does Situational Judgment Test Stimulus Format Matter?

Maaike Schellaert et al.

International Journal of Selection and Assessment2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70062article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of the stimulus format (text‐ vs. VR‐based) of a situational judgment test (SJT) on test performance, while also investigating the mediating role of test motivation and the moderating role of test‐takers' age. Results of a two‐condition (SJT stimulus format: text‐ vs. VR‐based) within‐subjects design among 121 participants showed no differences in test motivation between a VR‐ and a text‐based format. Further, results showed slightly higher SJT scores for the text‐based stimulus format than the VR‐based format, particularly for middle‐aged and older test‐takers. Finally, test motivation did not mediate the relationship between stimulus format and test performance. While existing knowledge is limited, this study provides little reason for concern regarding the differential effects of VR‐ versus text‐based stimuli on motivation and performance across age groups, paving the way for further research on technological innovations in SJTs.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70062

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maaike2026,
  title        = {{Test Motivation and Performance of Older Versus Younger Test‐Takers: Does Situational Judgment Test Stimulus Format Matter?}},
  author       = {Maaike Schellaert et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Selection and Assessment},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70062},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Test Motivation and Performance of Older Versus Younger Test‐Takers: Does Situational Judgment Test Stimulus Format Matter?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.