arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Retraction notice: Advanced cuttlefish optimizer-random decision forest (ACORDF) based design of fractional order PID controller for higher-order time-delay system

Unknown author

Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2026-0132article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The publishers of the Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology wish to retract the article George T. and Ganesan V. (2021), “Advanced cuttlefish optimizer-random decision forest (ACORDF) based design of fractional order PID controller for higher-order time-delay system”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. Link to the cited article. It has come to our attention that there are concerns that the peer review process was compromised, and that as a result, the findings cannot be relied upon.The publishers of the journal sincerely apologize to the readers.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2026-0132

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Retraction notice: Advanced cuttlefish optimizer-random decision forest (ACORDF) based design of fractional order PID controller for higher-order time-delay system}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2026-0132},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Retraction notice: Advanced cuttlefish optimizer-random decision forest (ACORDF) based design of fractional order PID controller for higher-order time-delay system

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.