(Self-)seduction in the manufacturing of consent: exploring <i>emotional exploitation</i> in the service sector

James Frederick Green

Labour & Industry2025https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2025.2549187article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article uncovers an underexplored phenomenon observed in managerial–employee exchanges within the service sector: emotional exploitation. Drawing on ethnographic insights from the public house industry, it explores how managers deploy emotion-inducing tactics to seduce lower-echelon workers into accepting unfavourable working condition. Crucially, such consent is not always manufactured by management; processes of self-seduction - where workers consent through self-persuasion - also play a central role. Emotional exploitation, this paper argues, is a routine feature of pub work, shaped by fluctuating emotional intensities, surplus or shortages of staff, and the affective pull of collegial relationships. It further examines how low-paid workers both heed and resist the mechanisms of (self-)seduction. In doing so, it extends Jocoy’s (2003) analysis of emotional labour within labour control strategies, adds to Burawoy’s (1979) theory of manufacturing consent, and deepens Hochschild’s (1983) thesis on the commodification of emotion under capitalism - highlighting how (self-)seduction further alienates workers from aspects of the self.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2025.2549187

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{james2025,
  title        = {{(Self-)seduction in the manufacturing of consent: exploring <i>emotional exploitation</i> in the service sector}},
  author       = {James Frederick Green},
  journal      = {Labour & Industry},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2025.2549187},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

(Self-)seduction in the manufacturing of consent: exploring <i>emotional exploitation</i> in the service sector

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.