‘Mansplaining’ - Reflections on Teaching Adults in University Classrooms

Ajit Bhattarai et al.

Advances in Developing Human Resources2025https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223251382408article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Problem Teaching diversity and critical human resource development (CHRD) presents significant challenges, particularly in politically polarized contexts and classrooms with diverse cultural and linguistic dynamics. Male educators teaching gender-related topics must navigate implicit power dynamics, including the risk of “mansplaining,” which is condescending explanations that reinforce harmful stereotypes. The limited literature on such pedagogical experiences complicates this task. Solution This trioethnography explores strategies to address gendered power dynamics in HRD classrooms. It draws on reflections from two hearing assistant professors and a Deaf graduate student, emphasizing the importance of centering student voices, understanding diversity needs and prior knowledge, fostering safe spaces, and practicing reflexive teaching. The findings highlight practical approaches for male educators to create inclusive, respectful learning environments while avoiding mansplaining and addressing systemic inequities. Stakeholders This study is directly relevant to HRD educators focused on teaching and inclusion, as well as to those indirectly devoted to the goal of creating more equitable HRD learning spaces.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223251382408

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ajit2025,
  title        = {{‘Mansplaining’ - Reflections on Teaching Adults in University Classrooms}},
  author       = {Ajit Bhattarai et al.},
  journal      = {Advances in Developing Human Resources},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223251382408},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘Mansplaining’ - Reflections on Teaching Adults in University Classrooms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.