Identifying structural vector autoregressions via non-Gaussianity of potentially dependent shocks

Markku Lanne et al.

Econometrics Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utag002article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We complement previous partial global identification results for the non-Gaussian SVAR model by showing that in the absence of co-skewness among the strucural shocks, the skewed shocks are identified and in the absence of excess co-kurtosis, the shocks with nonzero excess kurtosis are identified. The former case has the advantage that dependent conditional heteroskedasticity is allowed for. In each case, the remaining shocks are set identified, and these results can be combined to identify both skewed and non-mesokurtic shocks. To capture the non-Gaussian features of the data, versatile error distributions must be specified. We discuss the Bayesian implementation of an SVAR model with skewed t-distributed errors that exhibit dependent stochastic volatility, including the assessment of identification and checking the validity of exogenous instruments potentially used for identification. The methods are illustrated in an empirical application to U.S. monetary policy.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utag002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{markku2026,
  title        = {{Identifying structural vector autoregressions via non-Gaussianity of potentially dependent shocks}},
  author       = {Markku Lanne et al.},
  journal      = {Econometrics Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utag002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Identifying structural vector autoregressions via non-Gaussianity of potentially dependent shocks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.