Cyber risk assessment for capital management

Wing Fung Chong et al.

Journal of Risk and Insurance2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12504article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.48

Abstract

This paper introduces a two‐pillar cyber risk management framework to address the pervasive challenges in managing cyber risk. The first pillar, cyber risk assessment, combines insurance frequency‐severity models with cybersecurity cascade models to capture the unique nature of cyber risk. The second pillar, cyber capital management, facilitates informed allocation of capital for a balanced cyber risk management strategy, including cybersecurity investments, insurance coverage, and reserves. A case study, based on historical cyber incident data and realistic assumptions, demonstrates the necessity of comprehensive cost–benefit analysis for budget‐constrained companies with competing objectives in cyber risk management. In addition, sensitivity analysis highlights the dependence of the optimal strategy on factors such as the price of cybersecurity controls and their effectiveness. The framework's implementation across a diverse range of companies yields general insights on cyber risk management.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12504

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wing2025,
  title        = {{Cyber risk assessment for capital management}},
  author       = {Wing Fung Chong et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk and Insurance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12504},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cyber risk assessment for capital management

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.