← Back to results Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte
What the paper says As AI systems take on more organizational decision-making, traditional models of accountability — focused on identifying a single culprit when something goes wrong — are breaking down. Drawing on recent research, the authors introduce narrative responsibility, a framework that maps the real story behind failures, distributes ownership across teams, and embeds ongoing reflection into everyday practice. This approach is essential for organizations navigating the complexity of AI-enabled decisions.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63383/aomf5898 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{françois-xavier2026,
title = {{Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI}},
author = {François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte},
journal = {MIT Sloan Management Review},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63383/aomf5898},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI
AU - Vaujany, François-Xavier de
AU - Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurélie
JO - MIT Sloan Management Review
PY - 2026
ER - François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte (2026). Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI. *MIT Sloan Management Review*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63383/aomf5898 François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte. "Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI." *MIT Sloan Management Review* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63383/aomf5898. Rethink Responsibility in the Age of AI
François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte · MIT Sloan Management Review · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63383/aomf5898 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.