arbiter
JournalsAccount

Optimally‐Transported Generalized Method of Moments

Susanne M. Schennach & Vincent Starck

Econometrica2026https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta22486article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

We propose a novel optimal transport‐based version of the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM). Instead of handling overidentification by reweighting the data to satisfy the moment conditions (as in Generalized Empirical Likelihood methods), this method proceeds by allowing for errors in the variables of the least mean‐square magnitude necessary to simultaneously satisfy all moment conditions. This approach, based on the notions of optimal transport and Wasserstein metric, aims to address the problem of assigning a logical interpretation to GMM results even when overidentification tests reject the null, a situation that cannot always be avoided in applications. We illustrate the method by revisiting Duranton, Morrow and Turner's (2014) study of the relationship between a city's exports and the extent of its transportation infrastructure. Our results corroborate theirs under weaker assumptions and provide insight into the error structure of the variables.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta22486

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{susanne2026,
  title        = {{Optimally‐Transported Generalized Method of Moments}},
  author       = {Susanne M. Schennach & Vincent Starck},
  journal      = {Econometrica},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta22486},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Optimally‐Transported Generalized Method of Moments

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.