Teacher Compensation in a Changing Labor Market: Evidence from Michigan 2005-2015

Danielle Sanderson Edwards & Kaitlin P. Anderson

Journal of Education Finance2023https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2023.a908611article
ABDC C
Weight
0.54

What the paper says

abstract: In the past decade, education reforms implemented high-stakes teacher evaluation, limited tenure protections, and restricted collective bargaining. Large increases in compensation may be needed to offset these losses in employment protections to attract and retain teachers. We test this hypothesis by examining the impact of a set of policy changes implementing teacher evaluation, tying teacher tenure to performance, and restricting collective bargaining on teacher compensation in Michigan. We also explore the extent to which exposure to charter school competition moderates the effects of these reforms due to the fiscal impacts of charter competition. We find no evidence that districts increased teacher compensation in response to these reforms that arguably removed substantial teacher protections. If anything, districts decreased teacher compensation. Our results also indicate that these effects did not vary with the amount of competition from charter schools.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2023.a908611

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{danielle2023,
  title        = {{Teacher Compensation in a Changing Labor Market: Evidence from Michigan 2005-2015}},
  author       = {Danielle Sanderson Edwards & Kaitlin P. Anderson},
  journal      = {Journal of Education Finance},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2023.a908611},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Teacher Compensation in a Changing Labor Market: Evidence from Michigan 2005-2015

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.48 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.