Bridging the viability gap of microinsurance

Tarek M Seif & Hala Naseeb

Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions2026https://doi.org/10.69554/evmh9134article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Microinsurance serves as a risk transfer mechanism for low-income populations. Yet, significant economic challenges impede insurers’ risk assessment and the pricing of risk; this affects the viability of microinsurance and subsequently the widening of the protection gap, leading to underserved populations. Insurers need to be aware of the macroeconomic factors, such as the low penetration rates and the informality of the sector, both of which complicate the risk assessment and pricing process. Also, insurers must consider supply-side challenges such as the lack of reliable data, business models and cost perspectives when developing suitable products. Demand-side barriers, notably income volatility, further exacerbate the vulnerability of such populations, thus making insurance solutions unviable for both the insurer and the microinsured. Addressing these multifaceted challenges, coupled with active efforts to reduce the gap through government subsidies and private–public partnerships (PPP), improved strategies, business models, regulation and awareness, is essential to achieving sustainable microinsurance solutions and overcoming these viability risks. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69554/evmh9134

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tarek2026,
  title        = {{Bridging the viability gap of microinsurance}},
  author       = {Tarek M Seif & Hala Naseeb},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69554/evmh9134},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bridging the viability gap of microinsurance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.