The Impact of Market and Nonmarket Strategies on Firm Performance in Lithuania

John A. Parnell & Michael Davidson

Economic and Business Review2025https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1362article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines the impact of market strategies (global growth, differentiation, and cost leadership) and nonmarket strategies (political engagement and social responsibility) on firm performance in Lithuania. Based on survey data from 114 managers analyzed using partial least squares structural equation (PLS-SEM) modeling, a global growth/differentiation strategy has a positive impact on performance, whereas cost leadership does not. Nonmarket strategies positively influence firm performance, with larger firms benefiting more, ostensibly due to greater resource availability and institutional influence. Firm size moderates the relationship between nonmarket strategies and performance, highlighting the importance of tailoring strategies to an organization's specific characteristics. By focusing on firm size as a moderating factor, this study offers a nuanced understanding of how firms in Lithuania adapt strategies to align with evolving institutional frameworks and market dynamics. Managers in transitional and recently transitioned economies should integrate market and nonmarket strategies effectively while tailoring approaches based on organizational size.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1362

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{john2025,
  title        = {{The Impact of Market and Nonmarket Strategies on Firm Performance in Lithuania}},
  author       = {John A. Parnell & Michael Davidson},
  journal      = {Economic and Business Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1362},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Impact of Market and Nonmarket Strategies on Firm Performance in Lithuania

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.