Unveiling engagement patterns of Yellowdig users: analysis of learning behaviors in an online undergraduate course

Emily Faulconer & John C. Griffith

The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning2025https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2024-0074article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Purpose In online courses, asynchronous discussions are a common course activity that helps build community, explore concepts and provide an opportunity for formative feedback. Design/methodology/approach This case study explored engagement patterns in the Yellowdig platform used in an introductory-level chemistry class. Data were examined using Z scores, multiple regression, ANOVA and non-parametric testing to identify the impact of student activity on discussion and summative assignment grades. Findings Profiles of learner engagement were identified using the interactive, constructive, active and passive (ICAP) cognitive engagement framework. These profiles can be used as predictors of student performance. Moderately high and moderately low activity groups scored significantly better than low or significantly low activity groups. Originality/value This study unveils distinct learner engagement profiles linked to performance outcomes, providing valuable insights for online course design and pedagogical practice.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2024-0074

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emily2025,
  title        = {{Unveiling engagement patterns of Yellowdig users: analysis of learning behaviors in an online undergraduate course}},
  author       = {Emily Faulconer & John C. Griffith},
  journal      = {The Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2024-0074},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unveiling engagement patterns of Yellowdig users: analysis of learning behaviors in an online undergraduate course

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.