Reimagining International Law Teaching

Jed Odermatt

European Journal of International Law2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf021article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This review essay explores contemporary challenges in teaching international law as discussed in four recent books on the subject. The books all address various approaches to improving pedagogical strategies within the discipline but vary in their aims and approaches. A key challenge identified is balancing the need for theoretical and critical depth while covering the broad scope of international law’s ‘core’ topics. The books also highlight the tension between presenting international law as a unified system and integrating diverse regional and local approaches. The review argues that international law teaching today requires more than simply introducing students to fundamental concepts; it demands equipping students with the tools to critically engage with the international legal system. As international law increasingly addresses global issues like climate change, migration and international security, effective teaching should cultivate students’ problem solving and critical thinking skills, preparing them to navigate complex problems.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf021

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jed2025,
  title        = {{Reimagining International Law Teaching}},
  author       = {Jed Odermatt},
  journal      = {European Journal of International Law},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reimagining International Law Teaching

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.