Navigating ESG in Corporate Governance: Balancing Shareholder Primacy with Sustainable Business Practices

Luh Luh Lan

Victoria University of Wellington Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v55i3.9838article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Advancing the environmental, social and governance (ESG) agenda through company law presents challenges, particularly in common law systems, where directors' duties are traditionally seen as prioritising the "interests of the company", a concept closely tied to shareholder interests. Courts generally avoid evaluating the merits of business decisions and focus instead on ensuring that directors follow appropriate decision-making processes. Despite this procedural focus, ESG concerns are becoming an increasingly significant factor in corporate governance. Companies are being pressured to adopt sustainable business practices, and regulatory frameworks are evolving to encourage or require directors to integrate ESG factors into their decision-making. This article explores the evolving role of directors in advancing ESG goals and argues that, while courts continue to emphasise procedural correctness, directors must adapt to the growing societal, regulatory and market expectations surrounding ESG.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v55i3.9838

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luh2025,
  title        = {{Navigating ESG in Corporate Governance: Balancing Shareholder Primacy with Sustainable Business Practices}},
  author       = {Luh Luh Lan},
  journal      = {Victoria University of Wellington Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v55i3.9838},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating ESG in Corporate Governance: Balancing Shareholder Primacy with Sustainable Business Practices

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.