arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Comparing Alternative Approaches to Care Management Prioritization: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study of Acute Care Utilization and Equity Among Medicaid Beneficiaries

Parth Sheth et al.

Health Services Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70113article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Prioritizing Medicaid care management outreach based on predicted benefit from such services, rather than predicted risk of acute care utilization alone, was associated with similar engagement rates but substantially lower acute care utilization. This approach may improve the effectiveness of resource-constrained Medicaid programs.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70113

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{parth2026,
  title        = {{Comparing Alternative Approaches to Care Management Prioritization: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study of Acute Care Utilization and Equity Among Medicaid Beneficiaries}},
  author       = {Parth Sheth et al.},
  journal      = {Health Services Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70113},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Comparing Alternative Approaches to Care Management Prioritization: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study of Acute Care Utilization and Equity Among Medicaid Beneficiaries

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.