Quiet Quitting After Covid‐19: Antecedents and Gender Differences

Jarrod Haar et al.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70065article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Following Covid‐19, quiet quitting has attracted significant media attention. This study uses organizational citizenship behaviours to contextualise quiet quitting and examines its antecedents using two New Zealand samples: 791 employees and 228 managers. Drawing on the organizational citizenship behavior literature, we find empirical support for quiet quitting across both individual and organisational dimensions. We also develop and validate a new measure of re‐evaluating work post Covid‐19, which is strongly associated with quiet quitting. Most antecedents show significant direct relationships in the expected direction, with regression results indicating consistent variation across samples and dimensions. Gender moderation analyses reveal strong effects for organisationally directed quiet quitting, although mixed patterns emerge across specific antecedents for men and women. The findings suggest organisations should prioritise meaningful work and adequate pay to reduce quiet quitting, and strengthen organisational identity and supportive cultures, as quiet quitting is more prevalent toward organisations than co‐workers.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70065

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jarrod2026,
  title        = {{Quiet Quitting After Covid‐19: Antecedents and Gender Differences}},
  author       = {Jarrod Haar et al.},
  journal      = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70065},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Quiet Quitting After Covid‐19: Antecedents and Gender Differences

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.