Merit and the Recruitment Process in Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Schemes

Gbadebo Fatai Adeleke et al.

Management and Labour Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042x241312479article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study, grounded in the meritocracy theory, examined the role of merit in the recruitment process of volunteers for Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Schemes. We adopted mixed methods of data collection and triangulated sampling techniques. It was discovered that very few volunteers were recruited based on merit. Our findings revealed that applicants with personal connections to recruiters, such as shared state or origin, religion, or political affiliation, were favoured over others. Also, some applicants secured their appointments through monetary transactions. Bivariate analyses revealed that this lack of meritocracy significantly contributed to the scheme’s ineffectiveness and hindered the productivity and development of labour. This absence of merit in recruitment led to various negative job-related attitudes that prevented professionalism and rendered volunteers even less employable. Participants were further disadvantaged because of the scheme’s policies, which strongly correlated with alienation, financial instability and unprofessionalism. The study recommended that the scheme should employ merit in its selection process and pay more attention to human capital development.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042x241312479

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gbadebo2025,
  title        = {{Merit and the Recruitment Process in Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Schemes}},
  author       = {Gbadebo Fatai Adeleke et al.},
  journal      = {Management and Labour Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042x241312479},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Merit and the Recruitment Process in Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Schemes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.