I Gotta Feeling: Advancing Sentiment Analysis in Organizational Science

Imran Kadolkar et al.

Organizational Research Methods2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251408073article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Sentiment analysis (SA) has grown considerably in organizational science research over the past two decades, particularly in the last few years. While enthusiasm for integrating advanced natural language processing algorithms is encouraging, authors are not reaping the benefits of such tools fully. Our systematic review of SA application in the organizational sciences suggests that authors struggle to appreciate all of the decisions that are inherent to SA, the choices that are available at each decision point, and the consequences of each choice. To address this gap, we use a working example to illustrate four critical decision points authors confront when conducting SA, and the subsequent impact different choices can have on one's conclusion. Decision points include selecting the SA method, computing a sentiment score, preprocessing the data, and using an appropriate level of analysis. We conclude with a framework outlining five dimensions (e.g., accuracy, interpretability, computational cost) to guide the selection of an SA approach based on study goals and needs, along with seven recommendations to authors wishing to apply SA.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251408073

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{imran2026,
  title        = {{I Gotta Feeling: Advancing Sentiment Analysis in Organizational Science}},
  author       = {Imran Kadolkar et al.},
  journal      = {Organizational Research Methods},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251408073},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

I Gotta Feeling: Advancing Sentiment Analysis in Organizational Science

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.