arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

How Can Supreme Audit Institutions Select the Right Topics for Evaluations and Performance Audits? Results from the 2024 Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on Evaluation of Public Policies and Programs (WGEPPP)

Nico Granitzer et al.

International Journal of Government Auditing2025https://doi.org/10.56251/trjv5600article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Evaluations and performance audits require a robust selection process to ensure success. A thorough and systematic examination of potential performance audit topics allows the identification of those that present the highest risks and offer the greatest potential for improvement respectively. Furthermore, it facilitates determining the optimal timing for results to be integrated into the further development of respective public policies. Consequently, a well-considered selection of evaluation topics is more likely to influence existing public policies positively.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56251/trjv5600

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nico2025,
  title        = {{How Can Supreme Audit Institutions Select the Right Topics for Evaluations and Performance Audits? Results from the 2024 Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on Evaluation of Public Policies and Programs (WGEPPP)}},
  author       = {Nico Granitzer et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Government Auditing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56251/trjv5600},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Can Supreme Audit Institutions Select the Right Topics for Evaluations and Performance Audits? Results from the 2024 Meeting of the INTOSAI Working Group on Evaluation of Public Policies and Programs (WGEPPP)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.