arbiter
JournalsAccount

Who cares about groups? The Group Orientation Scale measures differences in the general motivation for group belonging and concern for group goals

Toon Kuppens et al.

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251406210article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Group and intergroup research often addresses the ways in which people care about a specific group but focuses less on caring about groups in general. Here, we investigate individual differences in how likely people are to join and invest in the groups to which they belong. This idea is related to collectivism, but collectivism measures have been plagued by theoretical and measurement weaknesses. We therefore developed a Group Orientation Scale and a Generalized Identification Scale to measure how much people care about groups, and test the scales’ predictive validity alongside related constructs. Both measures are reliable but the Group Orientation Scale items were found to be easier to comprehend. Furthermore, group orientation predicts identification with real and minimal groups, the intensity of emotional reactions to group concerns, contributions made in a public goods dilemma, intentions to engage in personal sacrifice to limit coronavirus infections, and motivation in group tasks.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251406210

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{toon2026,
  title        = {{Who cares about groups? The Group Orientation Scale measures differences in the general motivation for group belonging and concern for group goals}},
  author       = {Toon Kuppens et al.},
  journal      = {Group Processes and Intergroup Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251406210},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who cares about groups? The Group Orientation Scale measures differences in the general motivation for group belonging and concern for group goals

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.