arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Thinking (about peace science) in time

Erica Chenoweth

Conflict Management and Peace Science2025https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251316138article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

In this Presidential Address, I lay out three research streams in which my findings were valid when published, but which may have been time-bound to a particular period in global history. I identify the period in which major shifts appear to have taken place across all three research areas and speculate as to which changes in the global system may have interfered with the causal processes and mechanisms underlying those findings. I use this exercise as a way of demonstrating the importance of study extensions, inductive practices, descriptive and observational data, and fieldwide synthesis and collaboration in describing the emerging international order in which we now do peace science.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251316138

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erica2025,
  title        = {{Thinking (about peace science) in time}},
  author       = {Erica Chenoweth},
  journal      = {Conflict Management and Peace Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251316138},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Thinking (about peace science) in time

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.