Keeping local public servants in the picture: The 21st century public servant

Catherine Needham & Catherine Mangan

Public Policy and Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413116article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Local public servants are facing a range of challenges including recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, austerity, the cost of living crisis, and rising awareness of systemic inequalities. They have to work with partners in complex systems to support people holistically and inclusively. This article summarises research done in 2014 and again in 2024 to understand what it means to be an effective public servant. As well as sharing our key findings, the article highlights how the use of rich pictures to present the work to the sector gave the research a formative rather than summative quality. The work changed and insights deepened through ongoing dialogue with people working in local government, police, fire and health services. Across five projects (two with public servants, two with councillors and one on Covid-19), the common theme has been storytelling as a form of knowledge exchange.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413116

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{catherine2026,
  title        = {{Keeping local public servants in the picture: The 21st century public servant}},
  author       = {Catherine Needham & Catherine Mangan},
  journal      = {Public Policy and Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413116},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Keeping local public servants in the picture: The 21st century public servant

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.