arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Revisiting the Colonial Grammar of International Development in Sub-Saharan Africa

Elinam Balimenuku Amevor

The Review of Black Political Economy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401893article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article traced the concept of international development to the condescending, Eurocentric mission of civilizing the so-called Third World, including Africa. This perspective served as the template for Western development thinking, which informed Harry Truman's Point Four Program for countering the threats that the poverty of the underdeveloped world posed to their Western, developed counterparts. While sub-Saharan Africa, by default, is synonymous with the century-old colonial definition of underdevelopment, this article contributes to the clarion call to redefining development in Africans' own terms and cultural relevance. The paper argues for a twinlineal, Afrocentric approach to revisiting the colonial grammar of androcentric development. This course must be charted by pragmatic leaders who appreciate the nexus between gender and health as critical pathways to the application of decoloniality as the method toward an agentic, sustainable development thinking in sub-Saharan Africa.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401893

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elinam2026,
  title        = {{Revisiting the Colonial Grammar of International Development in Sub-Saharan Africa}},
  author       = {Elinam Balimenuku Amevor},
  journal      = {The Review of Black Political Economy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446251401893},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting the Colonial Grammar of International Development in Sub-Saharan Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.