Supporting Women-Led Businesses: Narrative Review of Recent Causal Evidence

Diego Ubfal

World Bank Research Observer2024https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae012article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Abstract Innovative women entrepreneurs can be agents of change and offer novel solutions to global challenges. However, they face multiple barriers to growing their businesses. I review the literature on strategies to support women entrepreneurs in improving their business outcomes. I focus on interventions designed to address four areas of constraints that influence their decisions and can impact their business performance: gaps in human capital, access to finance, access to technology and markets, and contextual factors such as legal and regulatory constraints, social norms, access to care, and gender-based violence. I conclude that evidence of modest average treatment effects and heterogeneity in treatment effects across various interventions suggests the need for more precise targeting. The multiple constraints faced by women entrepreneurs necessitates testing different packages of interventions. Moreover, the successful implementation and adoption of proposed solutions require consideration of the contextual constraints that differentially affect women-led businesses. While I highlight several interventions that show promise in supporting women entrepreneurs, significant gaps remain in the evidence concerning the most effective strategies.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae012

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{diego2024,
  title        = {{Supporting Women-Led Businesses: Narrative Review of Recent Causal Evidence}},
  author       = {Diego Ubfal},
  journal      = {World Bank Research Observer},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae012},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Supporting Women-Led Businesses: Narrative Review of Recent Causal Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.26 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.