‘Forgotten by Feminists’?:Women Leaders of the Indian Men’s Rights Movement Negotiate Gender and Justice

Srimati Basu

Indian Journal of Gender Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09715215251351408article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

As women’s organisations have mobilised the Indian state since the 1980’s to institute a slate of laws on intimate violence, men’s rights groups (MRAs) have formed in counterpoint to challenge definitions of dowry, violence and economic restitution. Organised against women’s legal rights in marriage and prominent feminist spokespersons, the groups ironically feature several women MRA leaders, heading auxiliaries such as the Forgotten Women’s Association and the All India Mothers-in-law Association. As women leaders who are explicitly anti-feminist, while seeing themselves as working for women’s rights, they occupy a contradictory space. Drawing on my ethnographic work with Indian MRAs, this article will present some of the ways in which such female leaders critique legal reforms and suggest alternate registers of fair outcome, while also identifying and resisting misogyny within their own organisations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09715215251351408

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{srimati2025,
  title        = {{‘Forgotten by Feminists’?:Women Leaders of the Indian Men’s Rights Movement Negotiate Gender and Justice}},
  author       = {Srimati Basu},
  journal      = {Indian Journal of Gender Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09715215251351408},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘Forgotten by Feminists’?:Women Leaders of the Indian Men’s Rights Movement Negotiate Gender and Justice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.