arbiter
JournalsAccount

Women Judges in Western Democracies: The Interaction Between Professional Paths and Prestige

Emilie Klovning

Columbia Journal of Transnational Law2021article
ABDC A
Weight
0.57

Abstract

While women remain underrepresented in the judiciaries of all common law countries, they are increasingly outnumbering male judges in civil law countries. A number of scholars and policymakers explain this discrepancy with reference to the different methods by which judges are traditionally appointed in civil law and common law countries (“the professional path theory”). This Note explores the rationales underlying the professional path theory and adds another element to the equation. To explain the variance observed, this Note argues, the professional theory must be supplemented by an understanding of how women’s success in attaining judgeship is affected by the relative prestige enjoyed by the judicial profession in each country (“the prestige theory”).

2 citations

Cite this paper

@article{emilie2021,
  title        = {{Women Judges in Western Democracies: The Interaction Between Professional Paths and Prestige}},
  author       = {Emilie Klovning},
  journal      = {Columbia Journal of Transnational Law},
  year         = {2021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Women Judges in Western Democracies: The Interaction Between Professional Paths and Prestige

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.57

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.56 × 0.4 = 0.22
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.