arbiter
JournalsAccount

He 'came across as someone who was telling the truth': 'Pell v The Queen'

David Hamer & Andrew Dyer

The Sydney Law Review2020article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.26

Abstract

When the jury at Cardinal Pell's second trial convicted him on 11 December 2018 of five charges of historical sexual offending, were the verdicts unreasonable or insupportable having regard to the ...

Cite this paper

@article{david2020,
  title        = {{He 'came across as someone who was telling the truth': 'Pell v The Queen'}},
  author       = {David Hamer & Andrew Dyer},
  journal      = {The Sydney Law Review},
  year         = {2020},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

He 'came across as someone who was telling the truth': 'Pell v The Queen'

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.