Unintentional Outcomes as a Catalyst for Brainstorming

Taly Reich et al.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin2026https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261435656article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Companies increasingly engage in ideation exercises both with their employees and the public. One field experiment with Marketing and Sales employees at a candy company and four laboratory studies demonstrate a novel strategy to promote ideation quantity and quality. They reveal that prompting people to reflect on a history of their own unintentional outcomes in different domains can promote subsequent ideation in brainstorming tasks. This occurs because reflection on one's unintentional outcomes can incite motivation to regain threatened control. We demonstrate this effect in various domains and in several different contexts that have practical implications for both organizational managers and individuals. Further, we identify a theoretically driven moderator of this effect, showing that the promotion of ideation occurs subsequent to control threats in domains perceived as relatively malleable, in which there is an expectation that control can be regained, but does not in domains perceived as relatively non-malleable.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261435656

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{taly2026,
  title        = {{Unintentional Outcomes as a Catalyst for Brainstorming}},
  author       = {Taly Reich et al.},
  journal      = {Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261435656},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unintentional Outcomes as a Catalyst for Brainstorming

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.