Is Market a Hero or Villain? A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of China's Patient‐Centred Healthcare Policy

Jingqing Yang

Review of Policy Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70091article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study applies the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) within a non‐democratic context, exploring the role of policy narratives in the implementation of patient‐centred healthcare policy in China. Drawing on a dataset of academic journal articles that reference both “market” and “patient‐centredness,” the research reveals how local implementers reframed national policy by aligning it with operative ideology. While national policy promoted socialist altruism, local actors often reinterpreted it through a market‐oriented perspective to address institutional constraints and financial pressures. Through the strategic use of narrative elements such as heroes and villains, these grassroots narratives subtly shifted the policy's intent without overtly challenging central authority and implemented the policy symbolically on the ground. The study contributes to the scholarship of Chinese health reform by examining the interpretation of national health policy from the implementer's perspective, and to the NPF scholarship by extending its applicability to authoritarian settings and by focusing on the understudied implementation phase of the policy process.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jingqing2026,
  title        = {{Is Market a Hero or Villain? A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of China's Patient‐Centred Healthcare Policy}},
  author       = {Jingqing Yang},
  journal      = {Review of Policy Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Is Market a Hero or Villain? A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of China's Patient‐Centred Healthcare Policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.