arbiter
JournalsAccount

Harnessing Transformational Leadership to Curb Unethical Pro-Group Behavior: Roles of Group Potency and Leader–Organization Fit

Mingyun Huai et al.

Management and Organization Review2026https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2025.10111article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Previous research mainly emphasizes relational factors that drive employees to engage in unethical behaviors to benefit their group, overlooking the role of ability-related mechanisms. However, understanding the ability-related mechanisms not only deepens our insight into unethical pro-group behaviors but also informs effective strategies for reducing such behaviors. Drawing upon social cognitive theory, we propose that employees who perceive low group potency are more likely to engage in unethical pro-group behaviors. In this regard, transformational leadership can reduce these unethical behaviors by increasing employees’ perception of group potency. Furthermore, we suggest that this effect is particularly salient when employees perceive a high leader–organization fit. We conducted an experiment and a multi-source, multi-wave field study to empirically test this theoretical model. Our research contributes to the literature on behavioral ethics and transformational leadership and provides practical implications for reducing unethical pro-group behaviors in the workplace.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2025.10111

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mingyun2026,
  title        = {{Harnessing Transformational Leadership to Curb Unethical Pro-Group Behavior: Roles of Group Potency and Leader–Organization Fit}},
  author       = {Mingyun Huai et al.},
  journal      = {Management and Organization Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2025.10111},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Harnessing Transformational Leadership to Curb Unethical Pro-Group Behavior: Roles of Group Potency and Leader–Organization Fit

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.