Do Civic Returns to Higher Education Differ Across Subpopulations? An Analysis Using Propensity Forests

Benjamin T. Skinner & William R. Doyle

Journal of Education Finance2024https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2024.a954742article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

abstract: We investigate how college participation may differentially influence civic behaviors among individuals who were between 18 and 20 years old in 2012. Using data from the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009, we consider two direct measures of civic behavior, voter registration and volunteerism. We generate our estimates with propensity forests, a machine learning algorithm that can mitigate bias when using observational data and supports investigation of heterogeneous treatment effects. Overall, we find that college-goers are more likely to register to vote and volunteer, though, conditional on volunteering at all, likely to volunteer fewer hours. We find limited evidence of heterogeneous returns across various groups, suggesting that civic returns to higher education are broadly shared by those who attend.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2024.a954742

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{benjamin2024,
  title        = {{Do Civic Returns to Higher Education Differ Across Subpopulations? An Analysis Using Propensity Forests}},
  author       = {Benjamin T. Skinner & William R. Doyle},
  journal      = {Journal of Education Finance},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2024.a954742},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do Civic Returns to Higher Education Differ Across Subpopulations? An Analysis Using Propensity Forests

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.