Spatial Distribution of Access to Service: Theory and Evidence from Ride-Sharing

Soheil Ghili et al.

Management Science2026https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02699article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We study access to ride-sharing across geographical regions using both theoretical and empirical analyses. We specifically model and examine the effects of economies of density in ride-sharing. Our model predicts that (i) economies of density skew access to ride-sharing away from less dense regions; (ii) the skew will be more pronounced for smaller platforms (i.e., “thinner markets”); and (iii) ride-sharing platforms do not find this skew efficient and thus, use price and wage levers to mitigate (but not eliminate) it. We show that these insights are robust to whether the source of economies of density is the supply side or the demand side. We then calibrate our model using ride-level Uber data from New York City. We use the model to simulate counterfactual scenarios, offering a quantitative evaluation of our theoretical results and informing platform strategy and policy. This paper was accepted by Omar Besbes, revenue management and market analytics. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02699 .

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02699

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{soheil2026,
  title        = {{Spatial Distribution of Access to Service: Theory and Evidence from Ride-Sharing}},
  author       = {Soheil Ghili et al.},
  journal      = {Management Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02699},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Spatial Distribution of Access to Service: Theory and Evidence from Ride-Sharing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.