arbiter
JournalsAccount

What matters to people when we sanction states? A conjoint experiment

Jarosław Kantorowicz & Elena Kantorowicz‐Reznichenko

Conflict Management and Peace Science2025https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251334955article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

We investigate how to design sanction regimes that enhance public support for sanctions in the sending countries. To this end, we conduct a conjoint experiment on quota samples in Poland and Germany, using the context of sanctions on Russia. We find that support for sanctions decreases as domestic costs increase. However, support can be bolstered through aid programs that mitigate these costs and through beneficial policy alternatives. Furthermore, we show that support for sanctions rises when the costs imposed on the target state increase and when the sanctioning coalition expands.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251334955

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jarosław2025,
  title        = {{What matters to people when we sanction states? A conjoint experiment}},
  author       = {Jarosław Kantorowicz & Elena Kantorowicz‐Reznichenko},
  journal      = {Conflict Management and Peace Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251334955},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What matters to people when we sanction states? A conjoint experiment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.