← Back to results Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies Tōru Yanagihara
What the paper says Butenyl isothiocyanate (BylITC), the hydrolysis product of the glucosinolate gluconapin, present in various cruciferous vegetables and in rapeseed, was administered in oral doses of 0, 50, 100 and 150 mg/kg to pregnant rats on day 12 to 19 of gestation. Maternal toxicity was indicated by reduced body weight gain and increases in the weights of liver and kidneys. BylITC doses of 100 and 150 mg/kg caused retardation of fetal growth and ossification.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360511 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{tōru1998,
title = {{Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies}},
author = {Tōru Yanagihara},
journal = {Journal of International Economic Studies},
year = {1998},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360511},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies
AU - Yanagihara, Tōru
JO - Journal of International Economic Studies
PY - 1998
ER - Tōru Yanagihara (1998). Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies. *Journal of International Economic Studies*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360511 Tōru Yanagihara. "Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies." *Journal of International Economic Studies* (1998). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360511. Market-Oriented Reforms and Social Safety Nets in Developing Economies
Tōru Yanagihara · Journal of International Economic Studies · 1998
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360511 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00 M · momentum 0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.