Learning from experience: Flooding and insurance take‐up in the flood zone and its periphery

Ivan Petkov & Francesc Ortega

Journal of Risk and Insurance2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70002article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Flood insurance take‐up remains low outside of the 100‐year flood zone (SFHA), where purchasing insurance is entirely voluntary, despite the availability of affordable policies. Merging building footprints and inundation data for a large‐scale flooding episode, we document substantial flood risk in the periphery of the SFHA and show that the storm led to large increases in take‐up. But, while in the SFHA, the increase vanished after 3 years, it was highly persistent in the periphery. The extent of flooding and the type of policies purchased indicate that periphery residents who experienced flooding for the first time revised upwardly their beliefs about flood risk and began purchasing flood insurance. We also argue that increased granularity in flood risk communication could increase take‐up before catastrophic flooding occurs.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ivan2025,
  title        = {{Learning from experience: Flooding and insurance take‐up in the flood zone and its periphery}},
  author       = {Ivan Petkov & Francesc Ortega},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk and Insurance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Learning from experience: Flooding and insurance take‐up in the flood zone and its periphery

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.