The extractive loops of biocapital: Venom procurement and antivenom production in India

Mathieu Quet

Social Studies of Science2025https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251347915article
AJG 2
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

A growing body of research and scholarship has examined the exploitation of animals by the biopharmaceutical industry, framing it variously in terms of labour, commodification, or hybrid processes. This article adds to the discussion through an ethnography of antivenom manufacturing in India. It introduces the concept of 'extractive loops' embedding species, locations, and work practices. Extractive loops form a continuum through which non-human life contributes to the manufacturing of resources (raw materials and finished products). The argument relies on a description of the operations required by the production of antivenom, involving: (a) several animal species (mostly snakes, horses, and rodents), (b) connections between a multiplicity of locations, from outdoor fields to industrial sites, (c) a wide range of professional practices, some of them strictly formalized whereas others are mainly informal (such as snake catching), and (d) heterogeneous exploitation of non-human life and products. Extractive loops highlight a key feature of animal exploitation: a recurring series of extractive practices contributing to the continuous fabrication of natural resources.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251347915

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mathieu2025,
  title        = {{The extractive loops of biocapital: Venom procurement and antivenom production in India}},
  author       = {Mathieu Quet},
  journal      = {Social Studies of Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251347915},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The extractive loops of biocapital: Venom procurement and antivenom production in India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.