arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

A Fabian paradise or a one‐man show? How the interwar Queensland economy seduced two prominent English economists

Alex Millmow

Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review2022https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12238article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

This article tells how the two British economists Hugh Dalton and Colin Clark, came to regard Queensland in the 1930s as an enviable model of economic development. Both men were Fabian socialists and impressed by Queensland's authoritarian premier and by its array of economic controls. Clark even surrendered a promising career at Cambridge to become an economic advisor there. In turn, Queensland, and a personal spiritual crisis, would propel Clark to discard Fabianism for Distributivism. In the final analysis Queensland's agrarian socialism was not drawn upon Fabian lines but rather impelled by a mix of rural development and electoral pragmatism.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12238

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alex2022,
  title        = {{A Fabian paradise or a one‐man show? How the interwar Queensland economy seduced two prominent English economists}},
  author       = {Alex Millmow},
  journal      = {Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12238},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Fabian paradise or a one‐man show? How the interwar Queensland economy seduced two prominent English economists

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.