A general diagnostic of the normal approximation in GMM models

Andrew Wang

Econometrics Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf005article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Summary This paper proposes a diagnostic method for evaluating the quality of the normal approximation in generalized method of moments (GMM) models through sampling from a quasi-Bayesian parameter distribution. GMM estimates are consistent and asymptotically normal under certain regularity conditions, and researchers often assume normality when conducting inference. However, the literature has identified several violations to the normal approximation, such as in cases with weak instruments or parameters on boundaries. We apply our diagnostic and find meaningful deviations from normality in three well-cited papers, which include examples of well-known violations. We also illustrate one example where the normal approximation works well. Our method is convenient to implement using Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms and serves as a sanity check for researchers before reporting GMM estimates and standard errors. It enables visualization of the quasi-Bayesian distribution, quantification of deviations from normality, and reporting of alternative estimates and credible sets.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2025,
  title        = {{A general diagnostic of the normal approximation in GMM models}},
  author       = {Andrew Wang},
  journal      = {Econometrics Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A general diagnostic of the normal approximation in GMM models

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.