The Northeast Atlantic Mackerel Crisis

Jens Leth Hougaard et al.

Strategic Behavior and the Environment2020https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000092article
AJG 1
Weight
0.36

What the paper says

From 2010 and onwards, a crisis has occurred over the distribution of a yearly total allowable catch (TAC) for the mackerel fishery in the Northeast Atlantic Sea. The European Union (the EU), Norway (NO), Iceland (IC) and the Faroe Islands (the FI) are players in this “mackerel crisis”. In the present study, we use game theory in an attempt to rationalize the actual behaviour of these players during the mackerel crisis. We identify the profit of each possible coalition structure (the coalitional values) by using a fisheries economic model, and quantify the coalitional values empirically by statistical estimation of the relevant functional relationships. Based on the statistical estimations, we define a benchmark scenario and conduct a number of sensitivity analyses. To try to rationalize the outcome during the mackerel crisis, we require that a relevant coalition must be internally stable in the sense that no structure has an incentive to split up. By using the notion of internal stability, we are partly able to rationalize the actual coalition formation during the mackerel crisis.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000092

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jens2020,
  title        = {{The Northeast Atlantic Mackerel Crisis}},
  author       = {Jens Leth Hougaard et al.},
  journal      = {Strategic Behavior and the Environment},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000092},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Northeast Atlantic Mackerel Crisis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.36

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.04 × 0.4 = 0.02
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.