Similarities, Differences, and Best Practices across Real Estate Education Programs in the United States
Mariya Letdin et al.
What the paper says
This study examined the similarities and differences among university-level real estate education programs in the United States, emphasizing how diverse academic disciplines prepared students to meet industry demands. Semi-structured interviews with academic leaders highlighted both the unique characteristics of different disciplines and their convergence on core competencies. Regardless of whether programs were housed in business, architecture, or urban planning schools, all programs emphasized the importance of financial analysis, market assessment, and communication skills. Additionally, industry feedback played a key role in shaping curricula, ensuring that graduates possessed the technical and interpersonal skills necessary for a rapidly evolving market. The integration of experiential learning opportunities, such as internships, case competitions, and project-based learning, further enhanced students’ preparedness for professional practice. The findings suggested that, despite differences in program focus, there was growing alignment across disciplines to meet the evolving needs of the real estate industry.
2 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10 |
| M · momentum | 0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.